In the interest of full disclosure -
and in keeping with the title of this post - my name is Larry Holdren. I’m a
partner at Pure Brand Communications where our clients include energy
companies, an economic development group, a law firm, the inventor of the
cowboy hat and numerous non-profits, among others. My father owned and operated
a community newspaper. He wrote nearly every article in the weekly Syracuse Journal. He also
regularly wrote a column and editorials and he clearly identified them as such.
In an era of declining readership,
viewership and penmanship
for that matter, the lines between what’s objective journalism and what’s not
are, unfortunately, not as clear as they were in my dad’s day.
Sure, there are issues related to
blogger transparency and “citizen journalism,” but those issues largely reveal
themselves through natural dialogue online and, now, regulation.
That’s not what this post is about.
This post is about the alarming
number of activist individuals and organizations masquerading as news
organizations.
Take the Examiner and ProPublica, for example. According to its
website ProPublica “is an
independent, non-profit newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the
public interest.”
Journalism? Really?
In a telling Q&A
with PR Week, ProPublica’s Editor-in-chief, president and CEO Paul Steiger
said, “…we will want to hear your side of the story and it's usually in your
best interest to tell us.”
The key word there is usually. More
than once, we’ve had clients who have shared their side of the story with
ProPublica via hours upon hours of their time and expertise, only to have it
ignored or, in other unfortunate situations, used against them in an effort to
advance an agenda.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m completely
in favor of investigative journalism. I think it plays a critically important
role in our democracy. But, first-hand experience with ProPublica shows that’s
not what they’re interested in. They’re interested in advancing an agenda. A
quick look at its leadership
and the other causes
with which they’re involved and financially support reveals that.
We should expect certain things from
“journalism,” particularly "investigative journalism." We should
expect fairness. We should expect balance. We should expect that every effort
has been made to uncover all of the facts and verify those facts. We should
expect that, if there are multiple sides to a story, each of those sides is
presented in a fair and balanced way.
ProPublica and others like it are
letting us down.
So, in your memory Dad, I predict
that 2010 will be the year of exposure. A year when the buzzwords that are
authenticity and transparency actually mean something. A year when activist
groups like ProPublica are honest about who they are and what they’re trying to
achieve.
- Larry
Email: lholdren@pure-brand.com
Twitter: @lholdren